[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#834009: marked as done (python-apt: FTBFS in stretch (missing build-depends on gnupg))

Your message dated Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:51:07 +0200
with message-id <20161022165012.GA23559@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#834009: python-apt: FTBFS in stretch (missing build-depends on gnupg)
has caused the Debian Bug report #834009,
regarding python-apt: FTBFS in stretch (missing build-depends on gnupg)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
834009: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834009
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: src:python-apt
Version: 1.1.0~beta4
Severity: serious

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with python2,python3,sphinxdoc
   dh_testdir -i
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_auto_configure -i
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
dh_auto_build
	python2.7-dbg setup.py build --force
running build
running build_py
creating build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7-pydebug
creating build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7-pydebug/apt

[... snipped ...]

AptKeyError: The apt-key script failed with return code 255:
/tmp/tmplfwiB2/fakeroot-apt-key add /tmp/tmpHWnppm
stdout: 
stderr: Error: gnupg or gnupg2 do not seem to be installed,
Error: but apt-key requires gnupg or gnupg2 for this operation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The gnupg package is not "Essential: yes". To reproduce, please try to
build the package on a chroot not having gnupg installed (sbuild now
allows this).

Thanks.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.1.0~beta5

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:17:43AM +0000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:python-apt
> Version: 1.1.0~beta4
> Severity: serious
> 
> Dear maintainer:
> 
> I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
> but it failed:
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [...]
>  debian/rules build-indep
> dh build-indep --with python2,python3,sphinxdoc
>    dh_testdir -i
>    dh_update_autotools_config -i
>    dh_auto_configure -i
>    debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> dh_auto_build
> 	python2.7-dbg setup.py build --force
> running build
> running build_py
> creating build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7-pydebug
> creating build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7-pydebug/apt
> 
> [... snipped ...]
> 
> AptKeyError: The apt-key script failed with return code 255:
> /tmp/tmplfwiB2/fakeroot-apt-key add /tmp/tmpHWnppm
> stdout: 
> stderr: Error: gnupg or gnupg2 do not seem to be installed,
> Error: but apt-key requires gnupg or gnupg2 for this operation.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The gnupg package is not "Essential: yes". To reproduce, please try to
> build the package on a chroot not having gnupg installed (sbuild now
> allows this).

Right, this was fixed on September 1. Never noticed this bug
report though, weird...


-- 
Debian Developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev

When replying, only quote what is necessary, and write each reply
directly below the part(s) it pertains to (`inline'). Thank you.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: