[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [gopher] Updated Gopher RFC



On 8 May 2012 08:44, Wesley Teal <wesleyteal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kim's got a list of documents that may be of use:
> gopher://gophernicus.org/1/doc/gopher/
>
> As for item types here's one possible list that seems to conform more
> or less to current practices:
>
>   0   Text file
>   1   Directory
>   2   CSO phone-book server
>   3   Error
>   4   BinHexed Macintosh file
>   5   Any binary archive
>   6   Uuencoded file
>   7   Index-Search server
>   8   Telnet session
>   9   Binary file
>   +   Redundant server
>   T   tn3270 session
>   g   GIF image
>   I   Any non-GIF image file
>   i    informational text
>   h   HTML file or Web-link
>   x   XML file
>   d   Any document file (PDF, PostScript, or word processor formats)
>   s   Any audio file
>   ;   Any video file <--oddly, this is the most commonly supported
> for video. I think it
>                                   dates back to ye olden days.
>
> Most of these are defined in RFC 1436, but item types 'h', 'x', 'd',
> 's', and ';' are extensions
> that are fairly common in modern usage, but are not supported by all
> clients. OverbiteFF recognizes 'd', 's', and ';'. Lynx recognizes 's'
> and ';'. DiggerDwarf and redgopher recognize 's'. Type 'h' is
> recognized by most clients.
>
> Some folks use 'p' for PDF, but at least one client (I can't remember
> which) recognizes that as a PNG image file. Some folks use 'v' for
> video, but I don't think any client supports it (I could be wrong).
>
> On 5/8/12, Wolfgang Faust <wolfgangmcq@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm considering writing an updated gopher RFC as per the suggestion in the
>> (seriously off-topic) thread "Whatsmyip for gopher!". I'm looking for
>> references to documents about gopher, particularly:
>> * The URL scheme
>> * A complete list of item types
>> * What to do about that pesky terminating period?
>> * Anything else you can think of
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Wolfgang Faust
>> 01010111 01101111 01101100 01100110
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gopher-Project mailing list
> Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project

I have an idea for selectors.  There is a large difference between
word processing files and page layout languages, so I recommend
keeping both d and p selectors.  d could be for word processing
documents such as Word, OpenOffice, and WordPerfect, and p could be
for page layout and markup languages such as LaTeX, PDF, PostScript,
and Rich Text Format.  I've got a bunch of good ideas, so I've been
working on a draft RFC that I will later publish.

_______________________________________________
Gopher-Project mailing list
Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project




Reply to: