Re: #! -- reconsideration?
- To: Ted Baker <baker@dad.cs.fsu.edu>
- Cc: quinlan@transmeta.com, seeger@cise.ufl.edu, Cragun@cise.ufl.edu, Don.Cragun@Eng.Sun.COM, Don@cise.ufl.edu, austin-group@opengroup.org, dank@alumni.caltech.edu, loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de, lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org, mats@laplaza.org, mcinquini@speedera.com, schilling@fokus.gmd.de
- Subject: Re: #! -- reconsideration?
- From: Maurizio De Cecco <maurizio@mandrakesoft.com>
- Date: 11 May 2000 11:14:30 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] lgzopxo3d5.fsf@ewok.mandrakesoft.com>
- In-reply-to: Ted Baker's message of "Wed, 10 May 2000 08:03:46 -0400 (EDT)"
- References: <[🔎] 200005101203.IAA18835@dad.cs.fsu.edu>
Ted Baker <baker@dad.cs.fsu.edu> writes:
> Or, pick something else, like your favorit cartoon expletive
> #*?&!#@*#!.
If (and only if) a new syntax/mechanism have to be defined, could
be a good idea to explicitly separate in the syntax itself
the standard body from the version from the command/interpreted executed ?
Maurizio
--
Maurizio De Cecco
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
Reply to: