[proofreading] Re: Initscripts management proposal
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Facility names
> ==============
>
> Facility names that begin with a dollar sign ('$') are system facility
> names, defined by the LSB, and MUST be provided by distributions. LSB
> applications should not provide system facilities. This document
> defines the following system facility names:
>
> $local_fs all remote filesystems are mounted
^^^^^ ^^^^^^
local
> This specification shall pre-define the following script names as:
>
> apmd atd crond dhclient dhcpcd gpm halt identd inet
> httpd kudzu klogd lpd mcserv named nfs nfslock pcmcia
> portmap random routed rstatd rusersd rwhod sendmail smb
> snmpd sshd syslog xfs xntpd ypbind
I'd object to 'httpd' instead of 'apache'. What If I want to run both
roxen for normal sites and apache for SSL sites?
Also it's not consistant with 'sendmail' (why not 'smtpd' then?)
> killproc basename [signal]
>
> This stops the specified program. The program is
> found using the algorithm given by pidofproc. If a
> signal is specified, the program is sent that
> signal. Otherwise, a SIGTERM followed by a SIGKILL
> after some number of seconds is sent.
> [ Same as sysvinit package ]
>
> pidofproc basename
to be consistant with the other names those 2 functions should rather be
named kill_proc and pid_of_proc IMHO...
Cordialement,
--
"Si ca sent bon : mange-le, sinon pisse dessus..." [Proverbe chien]
Reply to: