[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#760720: qrouter review



Hi again,

I've "implemented" option no.1 and pushed it to the git repo here:
  git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/qrouter.git

Regards,
Ruben



2014-09-20 10:13 GMT+02:00 Ruben Undheim <ruben.undheim@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> After a closer look, it seems like the version bundled with qrouter
> and magic is just an older version of tkcon.tcl (2.3). I don't see why
> it would not work completely fine also with the newest version of
> tkcon. I've tried qrouter with tkcon 2.7 and I don't see any problems
> (maybe Tim knows more?)
>
> But then, there are several ways of doing this:
>
> 1. Make tkcon an install dependency of qrouter and change the script
> which calls tkcon (a simple patch)
>
> 2. Make tkcon an install dependency of qrouter and make a symlink from
> /usr/lib/qrouter/tkcon.tcl  to /usr/bin/tkcon.
>
> 3. Make tkcon a build dependency of qrouter and copy tkcon.tcl from
> the installed tkcon package during the build
>
>
> Which method is preferable? I would think #1 is the cleanest and best.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ruben
>
>
>
> 2014-09-20 5:35 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>:
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Ruben Undheim wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like these are two different tkcon.tcl versions. I've seen
>>> that the package "magic" also bundles a tkcon.tcl version. You are
>>> possibly right here, but I would like to keep it as it is, as for now
>>> at least.
>>
>> Are these independent implementations or forks? Either way it would be
>> good if they could be merged so that there is only one version. Could
>> you work on that?
>>
>> If they are forks and you don't remove the version in qrouter, please
>> notify the security team about the embedded code copy:
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
>>
>> --
>> bye,
>> pabs
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


Reply to: