Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility
Hello,
On 2015-12-29 13:45 CET, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> wrote:
> As I said, the followings are not blocker, but unless you have a (good)
> reason for not doing them, I'd prefer to see them fixed/changed.
>
> * please use short format dh
done
> * add a Vcs-Browser field
done
> * please bump d/compat to 9
done
> * I'm pretty sure the *.dirs are mostly useless
removed
> * I know nothing of lips, and less about the packaging of lips stuff, but
> isn't there a dh tool to autocreate the postinst snippet?
I tried dh_lisp but it doesn't seem to generate the postinst scripts. I
left the postinst script and will post on the pkg-common-lisp-devel ML
to find out more befor the next release.
> * from check-all-the-things:
> + can you explain these?
> - Warning in 'control binary:"cl-asdf" Recommends:1' value 'sbcl | lisp-compiler': package lisp-compiler is unknown. Check for typos if not a virtual package.
lisp-compiler is a virtual package: https://packages.debian.org/sid/lisp-compiler
> - Warning in 'control binary:"cl-asdf" Breaks:0' value 'sbcl-common (<= 1:0.9.13.0-2)': package sbcl-common is unknown. Check for typos if not a virtual package.
> - Warning in 'control binary:"cl-asdf" Replaces:0' value 'sbcl-common (<= 1:0.9.13.0-2)': package sbcl-common is unknown. Check for typos if not a virtual package.
removed references to old package sbcl-common
> + please fix the first and fix upstream the others:
> - $ codespell --quiet-level=3
> ./debian/changelog:1247: Seperate ==> Separate
done
> ./test/ecl-make-image/readme.lisp:62: doesnt ==> doesn't
> ./doc/asdf.texinfo:2992: throughly ==> thoroughly
will submit a patch upstream
Thanks
Kambiz
Reply to: