[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 3636-1] openjdk-11 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3636-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/               Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
October 29, 2023                              https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : openjdk-11
Version        : 11.0.21+9-1~deb10u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2023-22081

A vulnerability has been found in the OpenJDK Java runtime, which may
result in denial of service.

For Debian 10 buster, this problem has been fixed in version
11.0.21+9-1~deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-11 packages.

For the detailed security status of openjdk-11 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openjdk-11

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEcJymx+vmJZxd92Q+nUbEiOQ2gwIFAmU+FOgACgkQnUbEiOQ2
gwJXIw//aBWnhU1zQSXVJDHCFmskdZvdSmnnsM5n6wj1KlrSWVIvDt9xo4lKC1Ss
QT7ocZlWydtvz3WwSEF//ml+CNGJR7F47lt3b99CaU9u+yTYmwYS5QDRtq/4a35Q
/ggJnq6wkG4vZo/Yzuxuh66m0BWcVMPAWJdexNJpEqBLhJvduRC50oZiKbeUnNzo
E28E5MwxD1IgNgEtEnmRDybDdGZrX44NwbV0qdxy4e6hIr+zI+GQV2XjBRL6NCnC
8dIVMyyvo1/C8Ygp71IWrymYsHU4fZgpCDJ4qyAmEgiamKNwl9oqtSa5KpheVqab
y9qIvrglJRA/p+7IJbpq5DnAxCfq4N3iKmfHlvq3Y+L95ZQP6Oqkc1bGSB0+CIGV
jZejlv+ijODlZSpEX3JQYw4kg64LrRjwio77gMpkTyMU24wLp9V6boJDqhBZe5bU
AMR6aOflSFGlSSsFvVfA3WrSCt7bz3YmxevpYrnjMVY04k8xD0GJaCk8ns7Gy8Bc
Dtmh/hFoehLSr+E0nJFrFwACXxySuv99yMIwaHyvZd3VED/5McxzTtxDHje34PW6
PWY7mhtShmeDHEBVYb6Gsbj9NypOZZaXoWHxqOsaGWIJPj2gdp7VIFcudkr3Lo8p
WOJ4m72sI1izXRO1mypjHCWGWOXyaC0auNvZlITxCD33wCL+WjY=
=IIx8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: