Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Conrado Badenas wrote:
> I've consulted WNPP page
> (http://www.debian.org/toc/prospective-packages.html) and nothing is
> said about lame ("L"ame "A"in't an "M"p3 "E"ncoder).
>From the WNPP page:
_________________________________________________________________
Packages that can't be packaged
* HotJava -- the license prohibits redistribution of any kind.
* Courtney -- the licence is too restrictive.
* KDE et al -- the QT licence is incompatible with GPL.
* 8hz-mp3, bladeenc, etc -- patent problems with Fraunhofer
Institute.
L.A.M.E. is an MP3 encoder (:)) just like 8hz-mp3 and bladeenc. I'll go add
it explicitely to that list.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: