Re: Can we have a debate?
>Francesco Tapparo <ftapparo@ntt.it> writes:
>
>> > Some of us believe in the needs of our users. (Actually, I suspect most
>> > or all of us do, whether we or they agree that non-free serves those
>> > needs or not)
>>
>> I am not sure about that. Surely this is not true in my case: The
>> Debian ojective come first, the Debian user after. I work for my
>> cause, not for the cause of others,
>>
>
>comments like this make me wish i never got involved with the debian
>project. we do have an implicit obligation to our users, if not
>explicit, as the social contract (still) says:
>
>4.Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software
>
> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free-software
> community.
>
>now i understand why you guys support this stupid resolution. you
>don't want the lowly users to interfere with your cause. you comment
>proves that you don't agree with the debian social contract and you
>shouldn't be a debian developer. i know i will resign if the general
>resolution passes.
What a shame!
Francesco surely agree with SC. And you could very well read
that the second sentence of his comment above is agree with
the SC. While his last sentence is just somewhat an emotional
mistake, but you Alex takes this weak point and attack
(in such a way to threaten???)
I can't in any means agree with a threaten.
___________________________________________________________________
ÐÂÏÊÈÈÀ±µÄ³±Á÷×ÊѶ£¬ÍøÒ×ÐÂÀ±Channel£º http://spicy.163.com
ÉÁ¿Í¾«Æ·£¬¾¡ÔÚÍøÒ×FLASHÕ¾£º http://desktop.163.com/flash
Reply to: