mutt signatures (was Re: Volume on -devel) [ot]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> With mutt, it's really a very trivial process. And remember, as Debian
sorry for the clutter, but that brings up a question i had wanted to
ask... is the application/pgp-signature thing that mutt does any kind
of standard at all? it's unfriendly to mhshow/mh-e, and i'm planning
to write some elisp to handle it for me seeing as mutt is so commonly
used for -devel postings, but i can only guess as to how it works in a
multipart message (ie, that it's always a disembodied signature for
part 1 seems reasonable to me, but could easily be false... also
whether it's a signature taken before or after mime munging for all
those = escapse and multipart separators). if it is a standard, where
can i find it? if it's not a standard, is it documented somewhere or
will i have to read the code?
tia,
phouchg
"Reasoning is partly insane" --Rush, "Anagram (for Mongo)"
PGP 5.0 key (0xE024447449) at http://cif.rochester.edu/~phouchg/pgpkey.txt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBNvKVGJ49M+7gJHRJEQLhvgCgtMCFXD7JLYbQ7LOvwMXGeffVX0YAniIE
ADc3myNCzS8z7bXLQn3bgrYx
=WVGu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: