Re: Request for Assistance: Alpha package of oo2c64
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Mike Goldman wrote:
> Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > > What is the suggested procedure for doing this? Should I just send the
> > > oo2c_64 tarball and my diffs to an appropriate maintainer, or is there a
> > > way I can build the package on faure, then sign it on my own machine
> > > before uploading to master, or should I just release a source-only
> > > package for now?
> >
> > build package on faure
> > scp *.changes, *.dsc to home machine.
> > on home machine:
> > for i in *.changes *.dsc; do pgp -sta $i -o $i; done;
> > scp *.changes *.dsc back to faure
> > upload from faure to master
>
> Hmm.... Unfortunately, faure lacks libgc4-dev which is needed for building
> oo2c.
I'm sure that there is somewhere you can request that packaged be
installed on faure..
>
> So, what I have done is, I have created an oo2c64_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz,
> oo2c64_1.4.0-1.diff.gz and a pgp-signed oo2c64_1.4.0-1.dsc, and uploaded
> these to Incoming on master.
>
> Somebody will have to take them and build them on a properly configured Alpha
> and/or Sparc64. (Both should work, though I have not tested Sparc64 -- is
> there a machine for developers to test with?)
Nope. There isn't a machine at all - there isn't a 64-bit userland for
sparc linux, yet. The sparc-32 binaries will run on our sparc 64s.
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: