[SECURITY] [DLA 3373-1] json-smart security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3373-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès
March 30, 2023 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : json-smart
Version : 2.2-2+deb10u1
CVE ID : CVE-2021-31684 CVE-2023-1370
Debian Bug : 1033474
Multiple vulnerabilities were found in Json-smart library.
Json-smart is a performance focused, JSON processor lib written in Java.
CVE-2021-31684
A vulnerability was discovered in the indexOf function of
JSONParserByteArray in JSON Smart versions 1.3 and 2.4
which causes a denial of service (DOS)
via for instance a crafted web request.
CVE-2023-1370
A stack overflow was found due to excessive recursion.
When reaching a â??[â?? or â??{â?? character in the JSON input, the code
parses an array or an object respectively. It was discovered that the
code does not have any limit to the nesting of such arrays or
objects. Since the parsing of nested arrays and objects is done
recursively, nesting too many of them can cause a stack exhaustion
(stack overflow) and crash the software
For Debian 10 buster, these problems have been fixed in version
2.2-2+deb10u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your json-smart packages.
For the detailed security status of json-smart please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/json-smart
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=cja+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: