Debian in the News: Debian 2.0 'Hamm' Review
[This article is cross posted to debian-announce. In the future, these
articles will only appear on the debian-news mailing list. To subscribe to
debian-news, please go to http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/subscribe or
send mail to debian-news-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with the single word
'subscribe' in the subject.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian GNU/Linux In The News
http://www.debian.org/
Debian 2.0 'Hamm' Review
September 15, 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Summary written by Michael Below <mbelow@post.uni-bielefeld.de> Thanks!!]
[Note: This review is not available online.]
German Magazine Compares Six Linux Distributions
http://www.ix.de/ct/
In issue No. 19 of September 14th, 1998, Dr. Oliver Diederich of the
German computer magazine c't compares six Linux distributions: Caldera
OpenLinux Base 1.2, Debian 2.0, DLD 5.4 Classic, Red Hat 5.1, Slackware 3.5
and SuSE 5.3. He focuses on the question of how the different distributions
manage to fulfill both the needs of newcomers and of more experienced
Linux users. Especially he compares the installation procedures, the
system management tools and the usability of the initial configuration.
For Debian, Mr. Diederich commends the start up screen of the configuration
program that presents the installation steps and recommends what to do. He
remarks that hard disk partitioning using cfdisk demands quite some
knowledge, even given the descriptions in the CD booklet. He disapproves of
a question for the location of "resc1440.bin" during kernel installation
without any hints on this in the booklet or the help file. He assumes that a
Linux newcomer would become definitively frustrated when confronted with a
list of kernel modules. Then Debian installs Lilo in the Master Boot Record
of the 2nd EIDE Hard Disk, giving a warning message that it might not be
able to boot from there. This happens, and Mr. Diederich assumes that even
the most dedicated Linux newcomer would give up at this point. Using a boot
disk he continues the installation.
On the following software selection via dselect he reports that it's
not possible to return to the preselection menu, so the user is
inevitably confronted with 1500 packages to choose if he picks custom
installation. In general he disapproves of the complex interface of
dselect, but he acknowledges its functionality, the dependecy/conflict
checking and the immediate configuration. He remarks that the user is
left alone by the explanations in the CD booklet after an introduction
to dselect, so answering the configuration questions is difficult. Also
the setup of X11 and the printer demand knowledge and work to an extent
that exceeds the demands of other distributions.
The author compliments the menu system, the online help system and the
adherence to the Linux File System Standard. He notes the modern glibc
library but reports problems with certain libc5 programs.
All in all he describes Debian 2.0 as a solid distribution for users well
accustomed to Linux, offering a big choice of software and no license
problems for the price of higher configuration efforts. He groups
Debian together with Slackware into a class of distributions for
experienced users, within this class Debian is the more current and
innovative distribution.
--
Nils Lohner E-Mail: lohner@debian.org
Debian Press Contact Press: press@debian.org
Reply to: