[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: quality of the cd images we are offering



On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:28:59PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> 
> > 
> > pule:/cdrom# find . -name Packages -exec grep '^Package: ' {} \;|wc -l
> >     984
> 
> Make that  grep '^Filename: ' | cut -d ' ' -f 2- | sort > packdebs
> 
> > pule:/cdrom# find . -type f -name '*.deb'|wc -l
> >     990
> 
> and  find... | sort > realdebs
> 
> then check the diff. That might give a clue about the cause of non-inclusion. 
> Note that dpkg-scanpackages will not include two .debs with the same package
> name, this might be the case here. 
> 

lucretia:/tmp$ ls /cdrom/upgrade/*deb
/cdrom/upgrade/apt_0.3.10slink11.deb  /cdrom/upgrade/dpkg_1.4.0.34.deb
lucretia:/tmp$

(thats 2.2r2 sparc)
I suppose there may be more debs hidden in some random location on the cd's.

mvg,

Filip

-- 
<aj> come on
<aj> it's a pico clone
<aj> it's *meant* to be annoying

Attachment: pgpk48i0QAWVS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: