Bug#1012552: marked as done (Text on cloud.d.o incorrectly says all checksums are signed)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:42:13 -0700
with message-id <20220811194213.lmsajzexfwwhbhnx@vanvanmojo.kallisti.us>
and subject line Re: Text on cloud.d.o incorrectly says all checksums are signed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012552,
regarding Text on cloud.d.o incorrectly says all checksums are signed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1012552: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012552
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-cloud@lists.debian.org, submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Text on cloud.d.o incorrectly says all checksums are signed
- From: Ross Vandegrift <rvandegrift@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 21:57:44 -0700
- Message-id: <20220609045744.hko26ai7ilix2w7j@stgulik>
- In-reply-to: <a6e9db6c-fd1f-6587-f373-c3c6060ee5d9@syseleven.de>
- References: <587080fc-7cdb-27f9-7d63-bf76326ae18d@syseleven.de> <a6e9db6c-fd1f-6587-f373-c3c6060ee5d9@syseleven.de>
Package: cloud.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi Olaf,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Olaf Seibert wrote:
> The PGP signature files, such as SHA512SUMS.sign, are missing from the pages https://cdimage.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/ and https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bullseye/latest/. They are promised at https://cdimage.debian.org/images/cloud/ and https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/.
The promises here are misleading - they only apply to the images from the older
OpenStack process, in the OpenStack/ directory. The other images in the
per-release directories are built by a pipeline on salsa, and we do not
currently have signing infrastructure in place.
I'm filing this bug to clarify the text on https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/
Sorry for the confusion,
Ross
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1012552-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Text on cloud.d.o incorrectly says all checksums are signed
- From: Ross Vandegrift <rvandegrift@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:42:13 -0700
- Message-id: <20220811194213.lmsajzexfwwhbhnx@vanvanmojo.kallisti.us>
- In-reply-to: <20220609045744.hko26ai7ilix2w7j@stgulik>
- References: <587080fc-7cdb-27f9-7d63-bf76326ae18d@syseleven.de> <a6e9db6c-fd1f-6587-f373-c3c6060ee5d9@syseleven.de> <20220609045744.hko26ai7ilix2w7j@stgulik>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:57:44PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> The promises here are misleading - they only apply to the images from the older
> OpenStack process, in the OpenStack/ directory. The other images in the
> per-release directories are built by a pipeline on salsa, and we do not
> currently have signing infrastructure in place.
>
> I'm filing this bug to clarify the text on https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/
The text has been updated to explain the difference.
Ross
--- End Message ---
Reply to: