On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:55:01PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > I'm calling on votes now for these three options (the last one isn't a > proposal, but by default in the option set). According to the > consitution, the voting periode last for up to one week, or until the > outcome is no longer in doubt. > | 1. Keep /usr/local writeable by group staff (i.e. leave things as they > | are). > | 2. Decide to change the default so that /usr/local is not writeable by > | group staff anymore. This change should only be implemented after an > | appropriate transition plan exists which enables system administrators > | to maintain the ability of group staff to write to /usr/local. > | (Reasons for the change are the adaption of other tools like sudo on > | most sites, and the concept of "least surprise" for novice users.) > | 3. Further discussion. I vote: 2 1 3 This message is signed with a key not in the Debian keyring, but technically nothing in the constitution requires PGP signatures at all, so meh. I'm happy to give people copies of my new fingerprint here at DebConf to prove it's really me. :-) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature