[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Quirinux: invitation to join the Debian derivatives census



[ re-adding Debian list as cc, to keep conversation public ]

Hi Carlos (cc Charlie and the Debian derivatives list),

Quoting Carlos Ramirez (2021-09-06 01:44:41)
> I don't quite understand well what happened here. But you wanted to 
> contact Charlie Martinez, and your email came to me. Probably due to 
> the list you copied. Now I have registered Pengwin because of that.

Yes, most likely my email reached you because you are subscribed to the 
Debian derivatives census list: I initially contacted only Charlie and 
that list, as can be seen here¹:

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2021/09/msg00000.html

Your reply on Sunday was targeted me and Charlie, cc the list:

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2021/09/msg00003.html

Only when my reply Sunday bounced² did I notice that two names were now 
involved in this email thread - in addition to the Debian list.  Please 
accept my apology for confusing you and Charlie in that email:

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2021/09/msg00001.html


Thanks again for adding Pengwin to the Debian derivatives census, Carlos 
- that is much appreciated!

@Charlie: I hope you will add Quirinux to our census as well.


Kind regards,

 - Jonas


¹ Theoretically I could have used Bcc which would not show in the 
mailinglist archive, but I rarely do that, and double-checked in my 
private mail archive that I didn't in this case either.

² Whitewater Foundry seemingly uses Microsoft for spam filtering, and 
Microsoft systematically refuses to accept emails sent from my domain. 
Not sure, but I guess that you receive my mails regardless, thanks to 
your Debian derivatives subscription (and my cc-ing the list).

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: