** On Apr 05, Joey Hess scribbled: > > Some think /var/shm, others /dev/shm, and still others /shm. > > I think /shm is the simplest least intrusive. > > Please explain how adding > yet-another-useless-top-level-directory-in-direct-violation-of-fhs-and-fsstnd > is "less intrusive" than burying it somewhere where you won't stumble over > it every day? Even more useless when one realizes that one probably will _never_ look into that dir - it's there just for apps. marek
Attachment:
pgpFJ8bmTY5rS.pgp
Description: PGP signature