Re: eliminating -source packages
adrian.bridgett@iname.com wrote:
> On a related note, I think that the current way of building the
> binary modules packages leaves alot to be desired. Currently my
> /v/l/d/available lists 8 different images files (and that's just
> i386). Am I really expected to compile a modules-source package eight
> times?
Ha! Welcome to my world. It's what I do all the time.
> An alternative is to get the people who make the kernel-image-*
> packages build the modules. However this isn't ideal either - are
> they expected to rebuild each time some module maintainer updates a
> package?
Well, there's the rub; isn't it? That's why I've never really been
upset (other than an occasional rant to blow off steam) that the
kernel-image maintainers do not build extra module packages to accompany
their kernels. The pcmcia modules that I maintain are released far more
frequently than the kernel-image packages.
> The best approach would be some auto-builder script which would
> rebuild things as needed. Any takers :-)
I would be glad to help engineer such a thing. I've developed several
crude schemes over the years to automate part of the procedure for
building all of those pcmcia-modules packages. (Unfortunately, after
tomorrow, I'll be unavailable for the next two weeks.)
- Brian
Reply to: