On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 10:22:42PM -0400, Brian Mays wrote: > adrian.bridgett@iname.com wrote: > > On a related note, I think that the current way of building the > > binary modules packages leaves alot to be desired. > Ha! Welcome to my world. It's what I do all the time. > > The best approach would be some auto-builder script which would > > rebuild things as needed. Any takers :-) > I would be glad to help engineer such a thing. This would be good. Somewhat related are boot-floppies: base.tgz is based upon all the packages in base, so should really be rebuilt whenever someone uploads a new version of any packages in base. I guess the process is something like: boot-floppies says "rebuild me if libc6/netbase/whatever gets updated" libc6/netbase/whatever gets updated autobuilder$ apt-get source -b boot-floppies autobuilder$ dupload *.changes pcmcia-cs would ask for rebuilding if "kernel-image-.*" gets updated, I guess (either a new package matching that pattern, or a new version of an existing package matching it). Hmmm. Working this into testing [0] might be tricky. Unless. I wonder if the boot-floppies package could have exact versioned dependencies on each of the various base packages (generated at compile time). That would, I think, nicely stop any base packages from getting added to testing until boot-floppies have been updated; and boot-floppies would be "automatically" updated even if one of the base packages had a binary only recompile with something like the above, so it shouldn't make for any great delays. And most boot-floppies development is done with the source package one would assume, rather than the boot-floppies.deb itself. Cheers, aj [0] http://ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/ -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and working code.'' -- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgpSDhFnAu4JV.pgp
Description: PGP signature