Re: debmake: a compromise?
On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, Richard G. Roberto wrote:
> How about taking this a step further and having debstd insert the
> commands it uses into the rules file for you so that you can
> peruse/tweak them right there? That would acomplish the same
> thing and keep its "automatic" nature in tact. This would also
> break the dependency on debstd within a rules file.
>
> I'll have a look at a recent version of it and see what it would
> take to implement this. If its more than an hour or so, I'll
> have to pass :-(
>
I'm going to have to pass on this one. Sorry.
Richard G. Roberto
richr@bear.com
011-81-3-3437-7967 - Tokyo, Japan
--
*******************************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or
agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account
activity contained in this communication.
*******************************************************************************
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: