Rosegarden package and copyrights

[Will Lowe <harpo@udel.edu>]

I'm about to finish the new rosegarden (2.1) package.  

I'm trying to convince the owners to go gpl,  but for the time being,  the
software has different licensing policies for the source and compiled
binaries.  Should I include both sets in the .deb,  or just the binary
license?

Also,  the package (for the time being) will have to be non-free,  as it
doesn't allow use of any sort for commercial purposes without permission
from the authors.  Do I just list it as 
section: non-free
                     					Will

			        harpo@udel.edu
			       lowe@cis.udel.edu
			http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/
*****************************************************************************
Good Idea: 	Feeding Stray Cats in the Park.
Bad Idea:	Feeding Stray Cats in the park ... to a bear.
***************************************************************************** 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .