Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before freezing Hamm
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> > The bug system is not a release-specific entity.
>
> I'm glad to know that you support my idea of removing bugs against
> bugs.debian.org from Brian White's list :-)
That is *not* what I said. Please don't lie.
> > Oh, I see, you can arbitrarily upgrade the status of the bug,
>
> That bug was reported by me. I think it has important severity.
> This is not the only bug I have reported against bugs.debian.org,
> but I consider it, while not being grave, more important than the
> others. If Ian does not agree, he will be able to change it.
I think you should reread the definition of important[1]. Important
is *not* there as a level between normal and grave, it is there
specifically for bugs that are important enough to stop the release of
hamm. And you are (intentionally or otherwise) misusing it.
[1] <URL:http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/debian/Bugs/Developer.html>
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: