Re: new handling of /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down}.d
On Wed 11 Mar 1998, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> I like the idea of the changes... But, being a newcommer... I missed
> the plans/timings for this function.
I also think the concept is a good one (I haven't examined it closely
yet), but that perhaps the timing is a bit unfortunate (just before the
freeze).
> Is this functionality intended for 2.0? I added support for these
I hope not...
> directories in sendmail_8.8.8-11 and wonder if I should/can dualpath
> the install (and pre-install to remove the current files), or what?
My package isdnutils installs /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down}.d/isdnutils if they
don't exist yet and ipppd is configured. This will have to change to
use the new concept, but I'm not confident that this can be done and
tested correctly in time for the freeze.
So, please don't implement this yet before the freeze! Save it for 2.1
(give the punters a reason to upgrade :-)
Paul Slootman
--
home: paul@wurtel.demon.nl | work: paul@murphy.nl
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
Support Randal Schwartz!
See http://www.lightlink.com/fors/ or send empty email to fund@stonehenge.com
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@debian.org
Reply to: