Re: Building glibc 2.0.7 using hamm
Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net> wrote:
> Personally, I would prefer that texinfo were packaged seperate from
> tetex-base and tetex-bin, so you didn't have to have all of tetex
> installed to build packages that need to create info pages.
That's the best idea I've heard all day!
> BTW, my recovering system is only missing pgp to be able to sign these new
> packages. How does a supposedly free US citizen obtain a debian version of
> pgp, or barring that, the source to said software? (my previous copy was
> extremely old, and I don't remember how I obtained it, and of course it
> resides in bit heaven now ;-S
nonus.debian.org (or any of the non-us mirrors)
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <hilliard@metrolink.net>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: