Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem
> This has made developers (many of whom were attracted by Debian's
> incremental and partial upgrade capability) very reluctant to
> upgrade. It has also made it impossible to fix bugs in bo.
True.
> Let us never make this mistake again.
> We have often good backwards compatibility, so that it doesn't matter
> if our stable distribution is a mixture of a.out and ELF or libc5 and
> libc6.
It would not be that easy for FSSTD/FHS mix I guess :)
That's why I would propose not have FHS-compliance goal for 2.1 release.
Instead, work on 2.1 as a "bugfix", simple package upgrade release, apt?,
and in parallel for FHS transition.
Thanks.
Alex Y.
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +-------------------------------------------+
| _ 7 | Alexander Yukhimets |
\ (") | http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ |
/ \ \ +-------------------------------------------+
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: