Re: RH and GNOME
On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 11:27:33AM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> You've *got* to be kidding. What is wrong with these people? If
> that's really the reason. I'm sure glad someone that lame's not in
> charge of libc.
>
> Assuming that the info in this thread's pretty accurate, I'm going to
> have to reconsider how much faith I want to put in E. I was
> considering switching to it when was released, but now other
> alternatives are looking better. I want something with a reasonable
> developer who works *with* others.
That is not raster. I once asked him to change some #defines in gdkimlib
to an enum to make it easier to do the perl bindings, something like
#define blarp 0
#define blurp 1
to
typedef enum {blarp, blurp} myenum;
He refused saying it would break binary compatibility! No chance to
convince him...
Neverless he broke binary compatibility the week later without
changing the lib version (and without applying the changes I provided)...
lupus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: