Hmm, once more I'm no expert, however.. The license says (upper cased for hi-lighting) b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Document or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at NO CHARGE to all third parties under the terms of this License. However section 1 of the DFSG says 1. Free Redistribution The license of a Debian component may not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license may not require a royalty or other fee for such sale. I'm not positive but it looks like it conflicts here.. The license says.. c) You must not add notes to the Document implying that the reader had better read something produced using Texinfo. This may conflict with two sections of the DFSG.. 6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research. AND 4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code The license may restrict source-code from being distributed in modified form _only_ if the license allows the distribution of "patch files" with the source code for the purpose of modifying the program at build time. The license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code. The license may require derived works to carry a different name or version number from the original software. (This is a compromise. The Debian group encourages all authors to not restrict any files, source or binary, from being modified.) This one is questionable, depending on how you try to read source and binary into text, however pre and post rendered text may very well apply.. You may wish to contact the authors to see if you can get them to change the license, otherwise chances are it will have to go in non-free.. Any comments from others on this? Zephaniah E, Hull. On Sun, Nov 15, 1998 at 07:01:20PM -0500, Mitch Blevins wrote: > A package named 'gnumaniak' has been released > http://personal.redestb.es/ragnar/ > > It contains man pages for many of the gnu tools that have outdated > man pages. I think this would be useful to package for Debian, but > I'm not sure the license is DFSG. In particular, look at section 2C. > http://blevins.simplenet.com/ldp-license.txt > > This can't go in main, can it? *sigh* > > -- > This .sig space available for lease. Please contact: > Mitch Blevins | mitch_blevins@mindspring.com -- PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E, Hull <warp@whitestar.soark.net>-GPG E65A7801 Keys available at http://whitestar.soark.net/~warp/public_keys. CCs of replies from mailing lists are encouraged.
Attachment:
pgpvLTX19E86w.pgp
Description: PGP signature