Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)

[Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>]

Montreal Sat Nov 21 00:30:32 1998

john@dhh.gt.org <john@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
> > QPL allows you to write a GPL program linked against it, so what is the
> > GPL'ed program's problem with the QPL library?
> 
> So if Microsoft added a clause to the MFC license saying that it was ok to
> link GPL programs to it then it would be ok?

Look, let's not drag this out for nothing.  Here was the initial
assertion:

> I think the real shame is that the GPL is not OpenSource friendly.

So apparently we're back to square one and let's leave it at that.

Thanks,
Navin