New DFSG v1.0aj

[Darren Benham <gecko@benham.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

There were only one objection to aj's wording of the DFSG2...

(
        refresher: 
        http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9901/msg00159.html
)

Why not move on with this?  From what I could tell (I'll keep going over it to
be sure), there's really nothing different with the DFSG1 in substance....

- -- 
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html                                     <><  *
* -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------*
*    Darren Benham     * Version: 3.1                                   *
*  <gecko@benham.net>  * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++*
*       KC7YAQ         * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS--   *
*   Debian Developer   * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++   *
*  <gecko@debian.org>  * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+                            *
* -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------*
=========================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNpe2Frbps1lIfUYBAQGj6wP+MaMqrgV9tTfc+tOqgMSDYUx/d3QD4nQV
DYze+wjcuyTHzIUV0ml4mo+3N07tVcNsDIXyxMB0hqZgDqMheEobNnMQKP2RDa3K
miItZRZTiiR8Xt0I3xEZbq9/hQyxEPb0CkLrRIC91b4Fo8+vxWnr4xALRbJNRigf
PjOhb0QtHas=
=/Ssf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----