Re: Unmet Deps revisted
Santiago Vila wrote:
> On 12 Jan 1999, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > > Since most of these packages only need repackaging I believe that
> > > they are candidates for the next bug squashing party.
> >
> > Yep.
> >
> > I think it would be good to file "important" bugs against all these.
> > Dependency bugs should be easy to squash.
>
> Fine.
>
> Would I get some support from people in this list if I submit the
> following bug?:
>
> *----------------------
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Version: slink
> Severity: important
>
> I can't install all the optional packages, because a lot of conflicts.
> *----------------------
Please give more details or the bug report would be useless.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about its friends.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
Reply to: