[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GTK oops?

>>>>> "Jules" == Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk> writes:

    Jules> Dear overworked gtk maintainer...  Did you deliberately
    Jules> upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13?  Looks confused to
    Jules> me..

It was deliberate, but it was a mistake. The GTK+ maintainers told
me 1.1.14 was binary compatible with 1.1.13 (because GLib 1.1.14 is
binary compatible with 1.1.13) but it was not.

It's been fixed; libgtk1.1.13_1:1.1.13-1 is in the archives now, and
libgtk1.1.14_1.1.14-1 is awaiting approval.

Ben

-- 
Brought to you by the letters I and O and the number 8.
"It is sad. *Campers* cannot *dance*. Not even a *party*."
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer of Gimp and GTK+ -- http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet/Open Projects IRC as Che_Fox.
Reply to: