Re: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?
From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 21:44:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990612214442.A4482@wonderland.linux.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87k8t9bga5.fsf@haitech.martin.home>; from Martin Bialasinski on Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 05:16:34PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 87k8t9bga5.fsf@haitech.martin.home>

On Jun 12, Martin Bialasinski <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de> wrote:
 >
 >I haven't heared that another MTAs do this better than exim. They
 >seem to be alike with respect to this.
I did, and I'm waiting for it to become 100% free (postfix).

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?
  - From: Martin Bialasinski <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?
Next by Date: Re: ITP: xslj, a XSL processor (XSL is one of the stylesheet format of XML)
Previous by thread: Re: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?
Next by thread: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread