Re: HTML instead of GNU Info?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: HTML instead of GNU Info?
From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 08:53:20 -0700
Message-id: <v04205105b38983e40cb6@[206.163.71.146]>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990613140750.A28800@pc203a.wi.leidenuniv.nl>
References: <19990613001538.A2136@DeepThought.> <[🔎] 19990613140750.A28800@pc203a.wi.leidenuniv.nl>

At 14:07 +0200 1999-06-13, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:

Personally, I'd love to have .texi source installed so I could build
PostScript when I need a printed manual.

This is very difficult for some packages, e.g. the glibc texinfosource is many files, and some live .. from the main parts.

--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)                    Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org>                 <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
<URL:http://web.espy.org/>               <URL:http://www.debian.org/>

Reply to:

References:
- HTML instead of GNU Info?
  - From: Norbert Nemec <nobbi@cheerful.com>
- Re: HTML instead of GNU Info?
  - From: "J.H.M. Dassen" <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Editor and sensible-editor
Next by Date: Re: Kernel 2.2.9 and Iomege Zip drive
Previous by thread: Re: HTML instead of GNU Info?
Next by thread: Re: HTML instead of GNU Info?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread