Re: Secure CVS: Have yous seen this?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Secure CVS: Have yous seen this?
From: Jens Ritter <jens@hilbert.weh.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: 01 Jul 1999 08:01:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87g138rjqq.fsf@hilbert.weh.rwth-aachen.de>
Reply-to: grimaldi@debian.org
In-reply-to: karlheg@cathcart.sysc.pdx.edu's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:03:29 -0700"
References: <87yah2pyem.fsf@bittersweet.sysc.pdx.edu>

karlheg@cathcart.sysc.pdx.edu (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:

> 		    Secure CVS via an SSH tunnel:
> 
> 		<URL:http://cuba.xs4all.nl/~tim/scvs/>

What is the difference between this and using ssh as rsh replacement
with cvs?

What are pros what are cons?

Jens

P.S.: Please vote against Spam! At
             http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
(Sorry Europeans only)
---
Jens.Ritter@weh.rwth-aachen.de   grimaldi@debian.org
Key ID: 2048/E451C639 Jens Ritter
Key fingerprint: 5F 3D 43 1E 24 1E CC 48  1E 05 93 3A A7 10 73 37

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Secure CVS: Have yous seen this?
  - From: gb@hugo.westfalen.de ( Georg Bauer)

Prev by Date: Re: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?
Next by Date: policy change to 3.0.0: not before release? (was: Re: when move /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc ?
Previous by thread: Re: Why was exim selcted as the default MTA?
Next by thread: Re: Secure CVS: Have yous seen this?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread