Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command
Roland Rosenfeld <roland@spinnaker.de> wrote:
>
> You told us to always use printf(1) as an alternative, but is this an
> acceptable alternative? Can we be sure, that printf(1) is always
> available (at the moment it located in /usr/bin, which makes it
If we decide to stick with POSIX compliant scripts, printf can easily be
moved to /bin. Besides, I will be implementing printf as an ash builtin
after potato and am happy to do it for bash if the bash maintainer would
accept it.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: