Quoting Andreas Tille (2024-04-10 22:44:25) > > I do understand the argument that lots of different workflows adds > > friction. But I'm just still using what used to be _the_ standard one > > (insofar as we ever had such a thing). Putting everything in salsa/git > > doesn't standardise workflows in itself. I think Ian/Sean identified 12 > > different git-based methods in their dgit review. > > I agree that different workflows are not helpful. We have DEP14[1] > ... but we have no efficient processes to > a) accept DEPs > b) dedicate to accepted DEPs or teach gbp about DEP14. See this git-buildpackage bug from *six* years ago: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829444
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature