HI Markus, Am Freitag, dem 30.09.2022 um 17:08 +0200 schrieb Markus Hitter: > Would you mind making a packaging patch? This would solve the problem > at least for Debian (and Ubuntu) users, giving upstream as much time > as they want or need. sorry, no chance! This has to be solved upstream, there will be no isolated Debian/Ubuntu solution to this. This issue affects Ghostscript, all PDF renderes, LaTeX, etc. across all distros. Thus, you have already done the right thing by forwarding your solution to upstream (or at least their distributor). It's up to them now. You know, the reason why we ditched the gsfonts package in favor of fonts-urw-base35 was that the former contained an unmaintained Debian- specific fork of the fonts. Patching the fonts-urw-base35 package in Debian would create the exact same situation again. ;) Thanks anyway! Cheers, - Fabian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part