Re: [DebianGIS] Re: grass compilation problems
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:43:48PM +0100, Stephan Holl wrote:
> Hello Francesco,
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:45:00 +0100 "Francesco P. Lovergine"
> <frankie@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:16:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 12:28 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why wait? Which version would you rather have included in etch?
> > > > I suspect 6.0.2 is the better one, and the version we want to
> > > > include in etch. If it is, immediate upload is the best option.
> > >
> > > This far from the etch freeze, probably makes more sense to upload
> > > right away, especially since 6.0.2 is a bug fix release. Only
> > > consideration is the extra wait for testing users. Anyways, the
> > > netcdf transition is probably more important to get gdal/etc in.
> > >
> >
> > The wating time is indeed for testing users, who currently have a
> > completely broken version. netcdf seems finally hinted, so in brief
> > we could have an almost working tool chain in etch. And that is a
> > good thing to increase testing.
> >
> > > > Besides, the autobuilders failed to build grass on almost all
> > > > archs, and a new upload might fix it.
> > >
> > > Actually, only on a few (alpha, mips, mipsel):
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=grass
> > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=grass
> > >
> > > The logs for the failed builds are not yet on buildd.d.o :(
> > >
> >
> > -2 failed, not -3 which is currently buildable. Also, grass is a damn
> > heavy beast for autobuilders, so I would avoid to uploading too often.
>
> Is the build based on the CVS-debian-files on alioth. If so, we would
> be happy to update the current files in upstream GRASS_CVS for the
> debian-build to have a propper debian-folder also inside the GRASS_CVS.
>
> Thanks
> Stephan
>
Sure, not yet updated for 6.0.2 anyway. It will be so soon, but currently
change quite often in respect with the stable grass tree. A different
branch should go for 6.1cvs (patches needs updates)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: