Bug#277611: marked as done (libc6: upgrade complains about libs in /usr/lib)
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:45:52 +0900
with message-id <813c07xyfz.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#277611: libc6: upgrade complains about libs in /usr/lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2004 08:17:58 +0000
>From miekg@atoom.net Thu Oct 21 01:17:58 2004
Return-path: <miekg@atoom.net>
Received: from sol.nlnetlabs.nl [213.154.224.43]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CKY90-0004ig-00; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:17:58 -0700
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (vhe-530008.sshn.net [195.169.222.38])
by sol.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFE2165F39
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:17:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elektron.atoom.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-15) with ESMTP id i9L8HsSZ014130;
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:17:54 +0200
Received: (from miekg@localhost)
by elektron.atoom.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9L8HsE5014129;
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:17:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200410210817.i9L8HsE5014129@elektron.atoom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: upgrade complains about libs in /usr/lib
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:17:54 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-18
Severity: normal
Hello,
When I upgrade the libc package on my firewall it complains about old
libs in /usr/lib and refuses to upgrade.
The libs it complains about are:
libdl.so.2
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
librt.so.1
Removing those symlinks makes the libc package installable again. However
the actual libraries in /usr/lib are not removed (they are part of
libc6-dev). So the next time I upgrade the libc package it will again
complain about those symlinks (because after the upgrade, ldconfig is run
which will recreate the symlinks...).
I've filled a simular bugreport some time ago, but I couldn't find it
anymore :(
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277611-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2004 02:45:52 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Oct 21 19:45:52 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CKpRA-0006fs-00; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:45:52 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 06A3EDEDDE; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:45:52 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:45:52 +0900
Message-ID: <813c07xyfz.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>, 277611-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#277611: libc6: upgrade complains about libs in /usr/lib
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200410210817.i9L8HsE5014129@elektron.atoom.net>
References: <[🔎] 200410210817.i9L8HsE5014129@elektron.atoom.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 277611-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:17:54 +0200,
Miek Gieben wrote:
> When I upgrade the libc package on my firewall it complains about old
> libs in /usr/lib and refuses to upgrade.
> The libs it complains about are:
> libdl.so.2
> libm.so.6
> libpthread.so.0
> librt.so.1
>
> Removing those symlinks makes the libc package installable again. However
> the actual libraries in /usr/lib are not removed (they are part of
> libc6-dev). So the next time I upgrade the libc package it will again
> complain about those symlinks (because after the upgrade, ldconfig is run
> which will recreate the symlinks...).
We don't have libdl.so.2 in /usr/lib. If we have the same problem, we
already fix it :-)
The actual problem is you misconfigured your system, or you put your
own libraries in /usr/lib in past. Please recheck. man ldconfig(8)
tell you how to see why such symlinks are created.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: