Re: RFS: golang-google-grpc + golang-github-google-s2a-go
On 12/24/2023 7:29 AM IST Maytham Alsudany <maytha8thedev@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this is a minor
> > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump.
> > Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the reverse-deps
> > with ratt[1] or ruby-team/meta[2]?
>
> I haven't yet, but hopefully I can leave rutt to build the 127 reverse B-Deps.
> I've changed d/control to Depend on either 1-3 or 1-5 of golang-github-golang-
> protobuf (to resolve conflicts with golang-goprotobuf).
Do you need golang-github-google-s2a-go as a dependency for any other package?
> I know that grpc is a pretty important package, so should golang-google-grpc and
> golang-github-google-s2a-go be uploaded to experimental instead of unstable?
> Then, I can go through any packages that FTBFS or fail autopkgtest and ensure
> nothing is broken.
Updates of gRPC can usually never go to unstable directly. IMHO you probably should've pushed to d/experimental
branch instead.
> > [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt
> > [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta
Best,
Nilesh
Reply to: