Hi Nilesh, On Tue, 2023-12-26 at 21:54 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 12/24/2023 7:29 AM IST Maytham Alsudany <maytha8thedev@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this is a minor > > > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump. > > > Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the reverse-deps > > > with ratt[1] or ruby-team/meta[2]? > > > > I haven't yet, but hopefully I can leave rutt to build the 127 reverse B-Deps. > > I've changed d/control to Depend on either 1-3 or 1-5 of golang-github-golang- > > protobuf (to resolve conflicts with golang-goprotobuf). > > Do you need golang-github-google-s2a-go as a dependency for any other package? It's blocking updates to golang-google-api and golang-google-cloud. > > I know that grpc is a pretty important package, so should golang-google-grpc and > > golang-github-google-s2a-go be uploaded to experimental instead of unstable? > > Then, I can go through any packages that FTBFS or fail autopkgtest and ensure > > nothing is broken. > > Updates of gRPC can usually never go to unstable directly. IMHO you probably should've pushed to d/experimental > branch instead. My mistake, wrong branch! > > > [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt > > > [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta Kind regards, Maytham
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part