On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:57:57PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > A user reported this as a bug: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291937 > > I do agree with him, indeed. Do you think we should proceed or waiting > for sarge release is sane? We discussed this a while ago, but can't find what we decided. If we decide to rename the package, I would seriously consider getting rid of the GTK/GNOME1 version entirely. Currently only diasce and libguppi need it. Both of them look like great candidate for removal from the distribution before Sarge releases, too. [10 secs later...] Except... gnucash appears to need libguppi16 :( Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jordi@sindominio.net jordi@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature