[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1051182: wsjtx: new upstream version 2.7.x



On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 03:45:53AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> Yes, backports would be quite useful since I already have it enabled.
> 
> > Which architecture are you looking for?
> 
> I will use it on amd64, which is rather standard fare these days.

I have prepared a package for bookworm-backports, but won't be able to
upload it until the 2.7.0~rc2 package in unstable migrates to testing, a
few days from now.

In the meantime, you can find amd64 binary packages for bookworm here:

  https://people.debian.org/~tmancill/wsjtx-1051182/

You can verify the downloads with:

$ sha256sum --check wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1.sha256
wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_amd64.deb: OK
wsjtx-data_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_all.deb: OK
wsjtx-dbgsym_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_amd64.deb: OK
wsjtx-doc_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1_all.deb: OK

And the SHA256 sums with (assuming you have the debian-keyring and
gnupg packages installed):

$ gpg --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg --verify wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1.sha256.asc 
gpg: assuming signed data in 'wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-2~bpo12+1.sha256'
gpg: Signature made Sun 17 Sep 2023 01:34:11 PM PDT
gpg:                using RSA key E50AFD55ADD27AAB97163A8B21D20589974B3E96
gpg: Good signature from "tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org>" [ultimate]
gpg:                 aka "tony mancill <tony@mancill.com>" [ultimate]
gpg:                 aka "[jpeg image of size 5851]" [ultimate]
gpg:                 aka "[jpeg image of size 3766]" [ultimate]
Primary key fingerprint: E50A FD55 ADD2 7AAB 9716  3A8B 21D2 0589 974B 3E96

Cheers,
tony

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: