Re: Ipv6 DNS and ipv4 host - Tranistion problem
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:20:10PM +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 19:09 +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:23:52PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Except for the fact that one will most likely get a /48, there really is
> > > > not much of a difference in IPv4 versus IPv6.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Just out of curiosity, assuming we're 15 years in the future, I'm connecting
> > > my *networkbox* to an ISP and I do neighbourdiscovery, would I get a /48
> > > from my ISP (assuming it has some way of verifying my relation with them)?
> >
> > With current policy you should. But there is a movement of thought
> > towards /56's becoming the standard.
>
> hmm, what's the reasoning behind the change?
Just a guess: Home networks probably won't need /48 networks.
Of course, that's assuming that won't be a problem with corporate
networks getting a /48...
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond
Reply to: