Your message dated Fri, 5 Feb 2010 00:52:14 +0100 with message-id <20100204235214.GA6624@galadriel.inutil.org> and subject line Re: [linux-2.6] more on bterm has caused the Debian Bug report #347186, regarding linux-image-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: garbled Matrox framebuffer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 347186: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: linux-image-2.6.14-2-alpha-generic: garbled Matrox framebuffer
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:08:49 -0800
- Message-id: <20060109090849.GB3481@tennyson.dodds.net>
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.14-7 Severity: important Sigh, can't get a break with alpha kernel support around here. After upgrading to 2.6.14 (from 2.4.27), the Matrox framebuffer no longer works correctly on my alpha with a Matrox Millenium II. The matroxfb_base module loads without error, but gives me corrupt video output only. Card info from lspci: 0000:00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA 2164W [Millennium II] and lspci -n: 0000:00:05.0 0300: 102b:051b dmesg output: matroxfb: Matrox Millennium II (PCI) detected PInS memtype = 0 matroxfb: 640x480x8bpp (virtual: 640x6553) matroxfb: framebuffer at 0x9000000, mapped to 0xfffffc8809000000, size 4194304 fb0: MATROX frame buffer device fb0: initializing hardware Happy to test potential driver fixes, though due to issues with *other* hardware in this system I didn't test the framebuffer with any previous 2.6 kernels and can't tell you whether it worked with them. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Gabriele Gorla <gorlik@penguintown.net>
- Cc: 347186-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [linux-2.6] more on bterm
- From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 00:52:14 +0100
- Message-id: <20100204235214.GA6624@galadriel.inutil.org>
- In-reply-to: <1241935689.4552.5.camel@tux4.penguintown.net>
- References: <1241935689.4552.5.camel@tux4.penguintown.net>
Gabriele Gorla wrote: > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > > I just swapped the millennium II with a ATI RAGE XL (atyfb module). > bterm still (mis-)behaves exactly the same as with matroxfb. > > I start doubting the bterm problem is an issue with the matroxfb driver. > > As a side note, loading atyfb does not corrupt the screen even if the fbcon module is not loaded. > The console stays in text mode until the fbcon module is loaded (with matroxfb the console goes > in graphics mode immediately producing a garbled display until fbcon is loaded as well) Alpha is dropped from the set of release architectures for Squeeze. I'm closing this bug. Cheers, Moritz
--- End Message ---