Re: apt-listbugs 0.1.38: Please update the PO translation for the package apt-listbugs

[Gaudencio Caluza <gpc75@yahoo.com>]

Yes, you are absolutely right. I missed my own error again.

It should be 'undgå/lås/ignorer operationer'.

Den 01-11-2022 kl. 18:07 skrev Francesco Poli:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 17:25:02 +0100 Gaudencio Caluza wrote:
>
> > I looked at the question to be translated in context as something more
> > neutral than trying to avoid bullets. But since the word 'dodge' is to
> > be translated then I must concede and say that the consensus is that the
> > word 'undgå' is the correct translation for 'dodge'.
> Perfect, thanks for confirming.
>
> > My mistake :(
> No problem, but please see another question below (your patience is
> really appreciated!).
>
> [...]
> > #: ../lib/aptlistbugs/logic.rb:676
> > msgid "There are no dodge/pin/ignore operations to undo. Ignoring %s
> > command."
> > msgstr ""
> > "Der er ingen undgået/låste/ignorer operationer at fortryde. Ignorerer"
> > "%s kommando."
> >
> > #: ../lib/aptlistbugs/logic.rb:678
> > msgid ""
> > "All the dodge/pin/ignore operations will be undone.\n"
> > "Are you sure?"
> > msgstr ""
> > "Alle undgået/låste/ignorer operationer vil blive ugjorte.\n"
> > "Er du sikker?"
> [...]
> > #: ../lib/aptlistbugs/logic.rb:720
> > msgid ""
> > "     u     - undo all the dodge/pin/ignore operations done so far.\n"
> > msgstr ""
> > "     u     - fortryd alle de undgået/låste/ignoreret operationer"
> > "indtilvidere.\n"
>
> Should "dodge/pin/ignore operations" be translated consistently?
> Maybe with imperatives?
> How would it be?
> Perhaps "undgå/lås/ignorer operationer" ?
> Otherwise, how?