Re: glibc is lgpl'ed...

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: glibc is lgpl'ed...
From: Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:52:57 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990410185257.06310@cs.mcgill.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] yahk8vkmwyw.fsf@tyr.diku.dk>; from Henning Makholm on Sat, Apr 10, 1999 at 03:22:31PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 19990409212242.22622@cs.mcgill.ca> <[🔎] 87vhf56tve.fsf@hasler.dhh> <[🔎] 19990410013251.48598@cs.mcgill.ca> <[🔎] yahk8vkmwyw.fsf@tyr.diku.dk>

Montreal Sat Apr 10 18:51:45 1999

Ahh.  Thanks a lot to both of you for clearing this up.

Navin.

Reply to:

References:
- glibc is lgpl'ed...
  - From: Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>
- Re: glibc is lgpl'ed...
  - From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
- Re: glibc is lgpl'ed...
  - From: Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>
- Re: glibc is lgpl'ed...
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>

Prev by Date: Re: glibc is lgpl'ed...
Next by Date: Is this license within the DSFG?
Previous by thread: Re: glibc is lgpl'ed...
Next by thread: Is this license within the DSFG?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread