Hi Louis-Philippe, Context: I had told Axel and Bastien that I'd seek their opinion before merging relatively big changes, so I've left some of the MRs as is. That said, I do have some comments below: > I had identified the following MRs are "it should probably be OK to merge" in another email I sent to this list: > > * https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/407 I want to merge this, but as it was discussed on the MR, it needs a policy change, which is tracked in: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039102 Seems there is an agreement for the change as well, but there's no new debian-policy released yet, and I'd want to process this bit only after it's formally in the policy. > * https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/453 I've set an auto-merge for this -- should be in as pipeline passes. > * https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/458 > * https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/462 > * https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/471 These look like relatively big changes to me, so I don't want to merge it w/o further reviews. > * https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/472 I'm tempted to merge this so maybe I'll take a closer look when I have more time. > * https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/473 This was already merged ~12 days ago. > It would be a shame if there was a release without some of those, as a few are trivial (yet pretty important for teams like the Python Team) :) I understand, I'm a member of that team as well :) PS: Party when? :P Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature