Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?

To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:43:10 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] ZLPz7mQgYGDFQmei@an3as.eu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1858418335.117064.1689490424873@office.mailbox.org>
References: <[🔎] 1858418335.117064.1689490424873@office.mailbox.org>

Hi Nilesh,

Am Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 12:23:44PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> What exactly is the point of having two separate fields in an arch:all package?

Probably no point at all.

> (Combining these into one would likely fix the bug as well)

Feel free to fix it.

Kind regards
    Andreas.

> [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/07/msg00188.html 
 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
  - From: Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org>

References:
- What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
  - From: Nilesh Patra <nilesh@mailbox.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: civetweb_1.15+dfsg-5_source.changes REJECTED
Next by Date: Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
Previous by thread: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
Next by thread: Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread